An Introduction to Structured Finance

First, of course, the legal disclaimer

Please note that the information in this guide is not to be used as consulting, accounting, or legal advice. The following information is provided with the understanding that this article is not a substitute for professional advice, and is merely for informational purposes. BizPlanDB.com is not responsible for the use of any information contained below or for the factual accuracy of any statements made below.

The Article

Fixed income rivals the size of the equity markets, although far less common interest is paid to bonds than stocks. Almost everyone has had an experience with a fixed income product. As a kid, you may have received a U.S. savings bond or you may own a mutual fund that specializes in fixed income products. If you purchase a bond or fixed income portfolio, you have become a lender. The risk of owning debt is that the other party may be unable to pay you back the principal of the loan. This is commonly referred to as credit risk or default risk. If you regularly trade bonds then an additional risk to your portfolio is that the bond you are holding can decrease in value should interest rates rise or if a borrower has their credit rating decreased. Bonds and publicly traded debt are rated by statistical agencies as to whether or not the company, government, or borrowing party is worthy of credit. Higher credit ratings indicate that a company or agency is in good financial health, and the borrower will receive a lower interest rate. Lower quality debt issues have higher interest rates because of the higher risk associated with holding this type of debt. This debt can also be classified as junk bonds. They are below investment grade securities and are usually considered speculative assets. Michael Milliken made junk bonds famous in the 1980’s. He single handedly created a trillion dollar market for these bonds. However, the risks of lending money to sick companies eventually began to overtake the rewards of the bonds. Certain types of investment companies such as pension funds and mutual funds are not allowed to invest in these securities which are why they are deemed below investment grade. However, this can be a positive for the shrewd investor. The risk associated with holding junk bonds is sometimes worth the capital risk.

Interest on bonds can be delivered in two methods. Some bonds pay interest on a yearly, semi-annually, or quarterly basis while other bonds sell at a discount and receive zero interest payments over the life of the bond. U.S. savings bonds are a popular form of discount bonds because you pay only half of the face value of the bond. At maturity the face value is paid to the investor. The vast majority of bonds pay interest at specified periods because it gives the investor the opportunity to retake some of their investment.

Bonds trade in secondary markets much the same way that stocks trade. When you purchase a stock on the open market, you are not giving your money to the company directly. The money that you have given to purchase a stock is given to another investor who is selling their shares to you. Only during an initial public offering is money given directly to the issuing business. The same is true of publicly traded debt.

Bonds are traded much in the same way that stocks are traded. There are several exchanges that trade debt, and there are also several auctions that are held by the government. Bonds also trade on margin, and usually to a much higher extent than stocks. Most brokerages will allow you to trade bonds with up to ten times the equity in your account. However, as we know, leveraging an investment can greatly increase the risk. Bonds tend to trade in less violent swings than stocks and so brokerages and banks feel comfortable in allowing higher leverage for these instruments. If you are trading bonds the interest received from the bonds will help offset the margin loan granted to you from your broker. However, this offset will only cover a portion of the interest that you owe to your broker, and it will never fully offset your margin borrowing costs. Your brokerage firm will always charge a higher rate to you as a margin borrower than the interest received from a treasury security. Corporate and foreign debt have lower margin levels since the risk associated with holding these bonds are significantly higher than holding U.S. Treasury debt.

Overall, bond trading is more complicated and more expensive than trading stocks. Among retail traders, stocks tend to be more popular as they have fewer complexities than bonds. When an investor looks at a bond, he or she must evaluate the credit risk, the market interest rate, and the underlying business.

Structured financial products are investments that allow companies to raise capital for profit generating projects or working capital. These finance vehicles are very similar to convertible bonds in that they carry features that are not found in traditional bonds or other debt instruments. In some instances the structured product that you purchase may carry a convertible feature. Much like convertible bonds, structured finance notes offered by companies typically carry these features as a means to entice investors to invest in their debt structure. The companies that raise money in this fashion typically are higher risk companies that would not normally be able to borrow through traditional lending routes. The added features to these debt instruments are often offered as a means of decreasing the risk associated with holding debt.

The American Stock Exchange is a popular exchange for these instruments. Occasionally, the New York Stock Exchange handles some of these issues, and they can be purchased as easily as purchasing a share of stock. These issues tend to be thinly traded, and so you may have to pay a large spread on the trade.

Earlier in the text, the Index Powered CD was discussed as a means for enjoying the returns of the stock market without having to take a capital risk. This product is a great example of a structured product. Additionally, the creations of portfolios that have these attributes are extremely mathematical and complex and it is to your advantage that you can acquire these instruments without having to construct the underlying portfolio. In this scenario, a derivative is purchased and the balance of the loan is invested in high grade corporate debt or government securities. Upon maturity the loaned funds have appreciated to an amount equal to the face value of the structure product. If the derivative did not make a profit then the investor will have broken even on the certificate of deposit. If the derivative has appreciated in value then the investor will receive a payout in addition to the return of their principal. Risk for this investment is related to the rate of inflation. There is the possibility that a profit payout will not be made, and as such the time value of money may have decreased since the certificate of deposit has been issued. However, this risk is rather small because the derivatives that are purchased for the CDs are usually linked to a broad index of stocks. Inflation usually has a positive influence of the prices of stocks. As stated earlier in the text, complicated mathematical models are used to determine the pricing of these securities and an attempt to recreate these portfolios may be difficult.

As stated earlier, it is possible to invest in the stock market without losing your initial principal over the long run. In fact, despite the highly mathematical nature of these instruments, it is possible to recreate a principally protected structure in your own investment account. Let’s take a look at a simple example. Imagine that you want to be able to profit from an increase in the value of the S&P 500 index without having to risk your principal. Today the value of the S&P 500 index is 1171. In the last decade a tracking stock known as the S&P 500 Spider is available for investors to purchase. This stock trades in value equal to one-tenth of the value of the S&P 500 Index. This equates to a Spider price of $117.10 per share. If you wanted to experience the gain or loss of the S&P 500, you could simply purchase shares of this trust and, you would make or lose money depending on the movement of the stock. But, you don’t want to take the risk that you could lose money should the market turn against you. Let’s imagine we have $120,000 to invest. If we wanted to buy the stock outright, we could purchase roughly 1000 shares of the index tracking stock, or we could do something else. Today, a two year, at-the-money call option on this index trades for $14.30 per share. If we wanted to replicate the profit of the index, we could purchase $14,300 worth of call options. If the index increases by an amount greater than $14.30, then our position will become profitable. Should the stock decrease, we would only lose the value of the call options and no more. However, that is a pretty significant risk to take since the index must rise by a pretty large percentage, and since we are no longer in a boom period, it is very possible that we would not make any money on this trade. However, if we take the $120,000 that we have planned to invest and purchase a zero-coupon Treasury bond along with the call option, we can take zero risk and still make the profits from a rise in the index. In this example, we will assume that the current Treasury rate is 5%. This strategy will require an amount of capital equal to the value of the S&P 500 index times the amount of shares that you would want to purchase. This strategy must be done in lots of 100 shares since call options are always sold in this denomination. When we purchase the zero-coupon bond, the interest received from the note will pay for our call option. The dollar amount of zero-coupon bonds that we will purchase must earn enough interest so that the value of the bonds will cash out at exactly the current price of the index. I know that is a lot to handle, so let’s take a look at it mathematically (Please note that this example makes not reference to taxes or commissions):

Custom-made Principally Protected S&P 500 Note

Bond Portion

We start with $120,000.

We purchase a five year 5% zero-coupon note for $91,750.00

After 5 years the bonds will appreciate to $117,100.00

The interest received over the five year period will be $25,350. This interest will be used to pay for the call options over the five year period.

Call Option Portion

After the bond purchase we have $28,250 in our account.

We purchase 1000 two year call options for $14,300.00

Overall Portfolio

We have 1000 two year Spider Call options worth $14,300.00

We have $91,750.00 worth of 5 year zero-coupon bonds.

We are left with $13,950.00 in our cash account.

This brings us to the $13,950 of cash left in our account. This leftover capital will be invested in a sweep account that pays the 5% compounding interest rate. Over the two year period of holding the call options, this remaining capital will earn $1,429.00 of interest. We will use this money when we purchase another set of call options after the current options expire.

For this position, we used slightly more capital than was needed. If you are going to be employing a more sophisticated method of investing then it is a good practice to always have a small cushion of capital for unexpected purchases or costs.

After we set up this position there is nothing else that needs to be done. Later, I will show you how to trade this position, but you can leave it just as it is and only look it on the days on which the options will expire.

As you can see, the interest received on the zero-coupon notes almost full pays for the risk capital. The amount of interest gained will not fully cover the cost of risk capital over the five year period, but the additional risk capital that we must invest is a rather small amount. If done properly, you can limit you risk exposure (over the five year period) to under 3% of the total value of the portfolio. This strategy is probably best done in an IRA account since the taxes from interest and capital gains will not be taxed until you begin to withdraw the money for retirement. As always, it is prudent to consult a tax advisor before you engage any investment activity.

One of the better aspects of this strategy is that you can consistently lock in gains should the value of the index rise. If we had purchased the index in the form of stock then it would be impossible for us to lock in gains while continuing to hold the position. For instance, if we had purchased the shares at 117.10 and they had appreciated to 150.00 then we must sell out the entire position in order to reap our profit. If we wanted to continue to hold the position then we would have to repurchase those shares, and should they decrease in value then we would lose our profits. In this strategy we can do something differently. Let’s imagine that the S&P 500 index increases greatly over a one year period due to a period of economic expansion. For this example, we will assume that the index has risen from 117.10 to 135.00. This equates to a 15.2% increase in value over the one year period. According the Black-Scholes Theory, a rise of this magnitude would cause the value of our options to increase from $14,300 to $28,350. If we wanted to lock in some of this gain, we could sell the options and receive the $28,350 and immediately repurchase another 1000 call options at the strike price of 135 for $18,365. We would realize a gain of $9,985. This gain is ours to keep because even if the index were to decrease in value to the original price of 117.10, our interest from the bond portfolio would continue to fund our option purchases. This is the best way to trade this type of portfolio because you can continually lock in gains as the index increases in value.

Let’s take a look at the portfolio as the options expire. Now that the two years has passed and the options are worth their intrinsic value, we can see how our portfolio has changed. For this example we will assume that the S&P 500 index has appreciated at a rate of 9% per year. In other words, the index has risen from 117.10 to 139.12. Since we purchased our call options with a strike price of $120, our call options will have a value of $19.12 per share.

End of Two Year Investment Cycle

The call options expire with a value of $19,120.

The interest gained on our bonds and cash is $11,569.

Our net profit is $16,389.

If we had purchased the Spider shares outright, our net profit would have been $22,020. We made less than this amount, but we did not have to take nearly as much risk in order to make 75% of the return. Again, this investment was not completely risk free. The differential between the cost of the call options and the interest received was $2,731. This risk correlates to 2.2% of our portfolio.

In the next example, we will look at what happens if there is a decrease in the value of the index. For our example, we will use a severe decline in the market so that we can see the benefit of having a principally protected portfolio. Earlier this decade, we watched the S&P 500 decrease from 1500 to 800 in less than two years. If you had purchased at this peak, you would have watched nearly fifty percent of your portfolio vanish. The index has not returned to this point, and if you had invested at the height of the market – you would still be holding losses today. However, if you had purchased the principally protected portfolio then you would only experience a minimal loss. Let’s take a look at what happens when a major index suffers a major decline. For this example we will assume that we started this investment when the index was at 1500, which corresponds to a Spider price of $150. We will also assume that we will purchase this portfolio to correspond to purchasing 1000 shares of the Spider stock. This portfolio will require $150,000 of investment capital. As always, our options will have a time horizon of two years until expiration.

S&P 500 Note – Index @ 1500.00 (Start)

We purchase 1000 call options for a cost of $18,436.

We purchase $117,528 of zero-coupon bonds (5 Year).

Our Cash Balance is $14,035.

Now let’s see what happens when the stock index declines from 1500 to 800 over the two year period.

S&P 500 Note – Index @ 800.00 (End)

The 1000 call options expire worthless.

Our bond gains $12,988.

Our cash balance gains $1,403.

The portfolio has a net loss of $4,045.

This loss correlates to a 2.7% decline in the value of the portfolio. The S&P 500 Index lost 46.6% of its value. We can see from this example that a vast majority of our portfolio was protected from losses. If we had purchased the index in the form of stock we would have lost seventeen times the amount of money then if we had purchased the principally protected note.

One of the main perks to this strategy is that if an event like the one described above happens then you can easily repurchase the portfolio and make a profit as the index rises. For the next example we will repurchase the portfolio when the index is at a value of 800. The above example caused our portfolio to drop from $150,000 to $145,955. Since the index is now at 800, the corresponding Spider price is $80 a share. We assume that volatility levels and interest rates have remained the same. According the Black-Scholes model, the corresponding two year call option price on the Spider stock is $9.83 a share. Remember, the model really only gives a very good estimation of what the options should cost. In reality, the price will deviate from that number and the model should really be used only to create an estimation of what you should be paying for an option. Our portfolio has not changed much since the expiration of the options. We are still holding our bond portfolio. Our options have expired with no value. Our cash balance is now $4,045 smaller. Let’s break down what is in our portfolio:

 Current Portfolio

Our zero coupon bond is worth $130,516.00

Our cash balance is $15,439.00

Over the next two year period, our bonds will gain another $12,988. However, the cost of 1000 call options at a strike price of $80 is only $9,830. We can use the entire amount of interest income to purchase options, so instead of purchasing 1000 call options we will now purchase 1300 contracts. Now let’s see what we have:

S&P 500 Note – Index @ 800.00 (Start)

We have zero-coupon bonds worth $130,516.00

We have 1300 call options at a value of $12,988.00

Our cash balance is $2,451.00

This is a real world example. The S&P 500 Index rose from 800 to 1150 over the two years following the very steep decline. Let’s take a look at our portfolio at the after the option expiration:

S&P 500 Note – Index @ 1115.00 (End)

Our zero-coupon bonds gains $12,988.00

Our 1300 call options gain $32,512.00

The cash balance earns $251.22 of interest.

Our net profit is $45,751.22

Since this is the second round of call purchases in our five year portfolio, we must peg this gain against the loss we took when the index declined. So, our total gain in the portfolio is approximately $41,706. Remember, we started this portfolio when the S&P 500 was at 1500. If we had purchased 1000 shares of the Spider stock then we would still be holding a $35,000 loss. Instead, we were able to make a 27% return on our initial $150,000 investment despite the fact that the index was still well below the level from which we started. Now, that’s just good investing.

Another feature of this investment is that we can borrow against the value of our bond and cash account. Most brokerages will allow you to borrow 90% of the value of the bond, and our cash account is always available for withdraws. Of course, the loan will have a higher interest rate than we will receive on the bond. Therefore, the dynamics of the portfolio will change should you chose to borrow money against the debt and cash of the account. It is not recommended that you do this since the interest expense from the margin loan will create a portfolio that is no longer principally protected. Essentially, the portfolio’s profit/loss will be based on the movement of the call option. As I stated before, it is best to borrow against the value of the portfolio only if you need the money or that the money you borrow will be reinvested at a higher rate. Stock options do not have a loan value and cannot be pledged as collateral for a loan.

There are drawbacks to creating principally protected notes. First, the expenses will be higher. Our example excluded commissions, and if you purchase this portfolio then you will certainly have to pay a large commission for the call options. A typical discount brokerage will charge a base commission plus one dollar to two dollars per option contract. The above transaction would probably cost around thirty to fifty dollars. Additionally, there is a spread associated with the purchase of call options. You will most likely pay about twenty dollars per contract for the bid-ask spread that is created by the market maker. This spread compensates the market maker for the illiquidity of longer dated options. In total the cost for establishing a 10 contact option position will cost approximately $250. The bond potion of the portfolio will also have a commission expense. The second drawback is that options do not receive dividends. If this strategy is used for a single stock transaction then you may be missing out on a good portion of the expected return, and so this strategy is not really appropriate for slow moving blue chip stocks that pay dividends.

Another drawback to this method of investing is that you may not gain the entire return of the index should the market increase greatly. In the above examples we saw that we gained, on average, about 75%-80% of the gain on the index. This is the trade off for the principally protected feature.

The above strategy is one of the least complex principally protected strategies. Most index and stock linked notes have many more attributes that are beyond the scope of this book. This is not the only type of principally protected note that you can purchase. The key to building these custom instruments is to allow yourself to reinvest the interest you will receive from a debt instrument into a derivative equity option. It is possible to even make these notes based on the movements of individual stocks, but it may require that you invest additional risk capital to cover the difference between the cost of a call option and the interest received. Volatility will be the determining factor as to how much additional risk capital will need to be employed. Higher volatility will lead to a higher risk cost.

These notes can be structured so that profits are made in a downturn of an index/equity’s value. Put options are purchased instead of call options. If you feel that the market is heavily overvalued, it is possible to take this position in lieu of a short position. In the long run, stocks always have had a tendency to rise, and taking a position that profits from a market decline will usually work against your favor. Let’s quickly run through an example. We will use the numbers from the above example for the sake of simplicity. The amount of capital needed is still equal to the value of the Spider stock multiplied by the number of shares that we would want to purchase or sell short. For our example, we will use the same 1000 share increment. Again, we will use two year put options. Let’s take a look at our starting and ending portfolios:

S&P 500 Note with Put Options – Index @ 1500.00 (Start)

We purchase $117,500 of zero-coupon bonds (5 years).

We purchase 1000 put options at a cost of $13,500.00

Our cash balance is $19,000.00

S&P 500 Note with Put Options – Index @ 800.00 (End)

Our bond gains $12,988.00 of interest.

Our cash balance gains $1,947.00

The put gains $56,500.00

Our net profit is $71,435.00

This profitability is only achieved in a very violent swing. The index moved down 46.6%, and our account correspondingly gained 47%. Again, these examples exclude applicable costs and taxes.

Another possibility is to create a principally protected straddle (purchasing both put and call options) so that a move in any direction will create a profit over the life of the note. Of course, in this strategy you would only be profitable on one side of the investment.  Any number of combinations is possible with this type of investment strategy.

Index linked and equity linked notes are similar to the Index Powered CD. Instead of being offered by smaller commercial banks, they are issued by large investment banks. These notes are not FDIC insured since they are not issued by a commercial bank. However, they may be backed by the issuing investment bank in the case that the note has a principal protection feature. If you purchase an index linked note, you are loaning money to the investment bank. The yield on these loans is dependent upon the change in value of a certain index such as the S&P 500 index. The amount loaned to the investment bank appears on the bank’s balance sheet and is backed by the credit quality of the issuer. Since only established investment banks have the ability to issue these notes, the credit quality of the issue does is not a major factor in determining investment suitability. It would be highly unlikely that a large bank would default on these credit notes.

Structure products trade on the national exchanges under ticker symbols and can be purchased as easily as stocks. The daily volume of these issues is usually small so the bid-ask spread may be excessively large. Although they are traded on the NASDAQ and NYSE, the majority of structured products are bought and sold through the American Stock Exchange. If you are interested in structured products then you should look into opening an account with a broker that has access to this exchange.

Structured finance products are very good investments because they offer the protection and income of a debt instrument with the yields associated with an equity purchase. The risk associated with these investments is determined by the nature of each note. Since they contain elements of both equity and debt, it is important to analyze the balance sheet, credit quality, and income growth of each business. Not all structured finance vehicles are principally protected. Arbitrage is possible within structured finance and it usually comes under the umbrella of capital structure arbitrage. In this form of arbitrage, both equity and debt are purchased and sold short in order to create a profit potential that may exist with the fluctuation of value in these instruments.

Convertible arbitrage hedge funds often deal with structured products because it offers a great amount of versatility for the fund managers. Some of the notes that you can buy have a convertible feature. Companies are now going directly to hedge funds to sell their subordinated debt because it reduces the time needed to fully sell the issue. The downside aspect for the company is that in all likelihood the value of the share price will decrease as arbitrageurs short sell the stock to offset the credit risk. However, the upside is that the capital received will be used to finance profitable projects for the long term so the decrease in price is only a short term effect of a new debt issue.

The amount of return that can be achieved with a structured product is limited. Index linked notes may cap the maximum gain on a monthly or yearly basis. From my research, I have found that the average index linked note has a cap of about 18%. This is still a very generous payout considering that indexes rarely rise at that rate. It is not very often that a major index rises by an amount greater than 18% a year and some of these notes have no upside potential cap.

Amplification of index and equity returns is another feature of certain structured notes. These are very attractive investments when the market seems to have no bias. The best example of an index amplified note is the ARES type note offered by Credit Suisse First Boston. In this structured finance product, CFSB pays out a rate of return that is three times the rate of return produced by the S&P 500 index. The current cap is 18% per year. During times of low market volatility, this is an extremely attractive investment, as you may receive a return that is substantially higher than the return of the overall market. The method of accomplishing this type of return is extremely complex because it involves a complicated series of debt investments coupled with an even more complicated array of futures and options. Arbitrage is possible with this type of security because you can purchase notes of the S&P while shorting an equal number of shares so that you will earn two times the increase of the S&P assuming the value of the index does not increase above 18%.

Great investing is simply about limiting your risk while still enjoying a healthy amount of return. In the above scenarios, we can see that we can take a very small capital risk but still create wealth for ourselves. While it is true that higher risks can lead to higher returns, the frequency of these vastly profitable scenarios is rare.  


Home  Templates  Samples  Tutorial   FAQ   About Us   Contact Us   Terms of Use
All pages and documents related to and on this website are the property of BizPlanDB.com.
Copyright 2007. All rights reserved.